What’s at the Heart of Conflict
Posted on 01. Mar, 2011 by Shawn Murphy in 1 Leadership
At the heart of conflict are two “needs.” If not acknowledged and dealt with they will slowly destroy a leader’s ability to build and keep relationships: the need to be heard and the need to be right.
Need to be heard
When people collide over differences, the knowing leader knows the importance of letting others speak their minds. When we are caught in the grasp of our anger, frustrations, disappointment they cry out to be heard. If any of these are silenced, conflict will expand and resolution is impossible.
Need to be right
This insidious viewpoint is complex. The reasons for it and the triggers of it are complex. Despite either, the need to be right drives a deep chasm between people involved in the conflict. There is no listening when a person feels the need to be right. There is no conversation. And without a conversation, a conflict is without a resolution. The need to be right is one-sided.
Leaders who pay atte
ntion to interactions know the importance of letting others speak their minds. And often such leaders speak last and use questions to encourage dialogue. This knowledge is vital to help resolve conflict. When people collide over words, actions, and approaches the knowing leader keeps their eye on the importance of relationships and their impact on results.
Experienced leaders learn over time that the need to be right is as much about ego as it is about the debate. And while debate has its value, debate to prove a point or to show one’s intelligence is rooted in behavior that tears apart a team. The experienced leader will do right for the person who needs to be right and the team by coaching the person to let go of the need to be right.





Jen Reyna
01. Mar, 2011
This is an interesting piece. I think the best skill we can learn in communication is making sure the other side feels “heard”. This is not only true in conflict situations, but also in customer service. You are right on target with your point about letting the other side speak their mind. When they are done, a good leader or a good CSA will ackowledge key points that were communicated. This does *not* mean agreeing with them, which is where I think ego comes into play so often. Once an upset person feels heard, it crosses over into feeling understood. And then resolution can begin. Asking questions is a great way to continue to clarify what is really at the heart of the issue. First, put your own ego aside. Others will follow suit.
Shawn Murphy
01. Mar, 2011
Hi Jen,
One of my favorite quotes is, “seek first to understand, then to be understood” from Covey. It can be very powerful to genuinely create an open environment to where the other person can share what’s on their mind. And you’re right – agreement is not always the desired outcome. It may be can the person live with the outcome. They don’t have to like, but they can move forward.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts,
Shawn